-----------------------------------
Artificial Life and Real Robot
reviewed by Nada Alaa and Niveen Ali
The pdf of the paper is not included, plus it seems to be a conference paper (not a journal paper).
I liked that each slide had only one point. No copying-and-pasting of a lot of text, here - which is great. I also liked that in slides 2 and 3 you showed your authorial voice ("the paper inquired into … and then it got into details of …"). You are conveying to me the general picture of the paper.
Unfortunately for you, the paper got into genetic programming, something about which you know little, and so your slides seem lost by the end.
Choice of Journal Paper and Students' Comprehension of it: 3.5
Summarising Research Paper Content and Structuring of Presentation: 4
-----------------------------------
Untitled
reviewed by Mostafa Hany and Ahmed Alaa
No reference to the paper you based on the presentation on. No title of presentation. I don't think the paper was a journal paper.
Only four slides. The slides were all titled with a question - interesting, why?
Text of slides was obviously copy-and-paste from the paper. Too much text on each slide. No conclusions.
Overall, I thought the slides useful and I learnt something from them. Your choice of content was interesting: combining AI and Games. But much more work needed to be done.
Choice of Journal Paper and Students' Comprehension of it: 3.5
Summarising Research Paper Content and Structuring of Presentation: 3
-----------------------------------
Intelligence Without Representation
reviewed by Nathalie Amir and Mina Karam
What role does the Word document play? I found that it was mostly copy-and-paste from various sources.
There are too many slides. It would have been impossible for you to present these in ten minutes. It is clear that the slides copy-and-paste from online sources. Therefore you must make it clear that you are copying, otherwise you are plagiarising, which is a serious offence.
The choice of journal paper was excellent and I could see that you tried to review the paper well. Maybe it was a little too much for you, because of all the concepts and because the author is presenting an untraditional approach to AI. You probably would have made a better job with a paper that had a narrower focus.
Whereas I liked that you tried to find out what other people are saying about the paper, so that you can build on their thoughts, I am not sure this has helped you in the end, because you now give the impression of people who copied-and-pasted from as many sources as they could find. Also, it opens up the question of whether you chose the paper because you found someone else had already reviewed it, so you could steal their work, not because you read and liked the paper.
Choice of Journal Paper and Students' Comprehension of it: 3.5
Summarising Research Paper Content and Structuring of Presentation: 3.5
-----------------------------------
Games, Computers and AI
reviewed by Sarah Sameh and Ola Mokhtar
The slide design is very attractive. Each slide has just about enough text, not too much.
My main criticism of this presentation is that the text is clearly copied from the paper's text. I am not sure you were able to understand the content of the paper.
Choice of Journal Paper and Students' Comprehension of it: 3.5
Summarising Research Paper Content and Structuring of Presentation: 4.5
-----------------------------------
Is Holography the Future of Multimedia Storage
reviewed by Ahmed Aly and Omar Said
The slides have excellent design and each slide has not too much text.
The pdf of the paper is not included, nor is any reference made to it. The paper seems a conference paper. I am not sure this relates to AI.
Choice of Journal Paper and Students' Comprehension of it: 2.5
Summarising Research Paper Content and Structuring of Presentation: 4.5
-----------------------------------
Adaptive Constraint Satisfaction
reviewed by Mohammed Ezzat and Ahmed Mostafa
The text tended to be too much per slide.
This is obviously a copy-and-paste job from the text of the paper. Constraint Satisfaction is not a topic you are "prepared for" and so your choice of paper was not good.
Choice of Journal Paper and Students' Comprehension of it: 3
Summarising Research Paper Content and Structuring of Presentation: 4
-----------------------------------
Smart Meeting Rooms
reviewed by Mina Nicola and Ahmed Ayman
I liked this presentation and the topic is nice.
The text tended to be too much per slide. I liked that you included images to illustrate the text.
You did not pick a good paper to demonstrate your efforts. The paper covers a wide range and so you had to summarise lots of concepts.
Choice of Journal Paper and Students' Comprehension of it: 4.5
Summarising Research Paper Content and Structuring of Presentation: 4.5
-----------------------------------
Robotic Surgery
reviewed by Ahmed Al Ayat and Sherif El Behairy
Great topic. No paper included in zip file. Full reference not provided either.
I think this would have made an excellent presentation.
Choice of Journal Paper and Students' Comprehension of it: 4.5
Summarising Research Paper Content and Structuring of Presentation: 4.5
-----------------------------------
Turing Test: First 50 Years
reviewed by Marian Moheb and Salma Sameh
Good topic, nice presentation. Would have liked to see you present it.
Where is the pdf of the paper?
Choice of Journal Paper and Students' Comprehension of it: 4.5
Summarising Research Paper Content and Structuring of Presentation: 4.5
-----------------------------------
If not Turing's Test, then What
reviewed by Maria Nichola and Lina Nabil
Where is the pdf of the paper? Where is the full reference to it?
The presentation was very well-illustrated and I felt that the text was probably all yours (you didn't plagiarise a lot). But I don't think you did a good job in summarising the paper so as to explain its content.
Choice of Journal Paper and Students' Comprehension of it: 3.5
Summarising Research Paper Content and Structuring of Presentation: 4.5
-----------------------------------
Tests of Machine Intelligence
reviewed by Shrouk Moataz and Kholoud Raafat
The title of the paper starts with Tests, but your presentation's title starts with Test!
What is the full reference to the paper? Is it a journal paper?
I enjoyed this presentation, I would have liked to see you present it. It lacked pictures and examples.
Choice of Journal Paper and Students' Comprehension of it: 4.5
Summarising Research Paper Content and Structuring of Presentation: 4.5
-----------------------------------
